Theory and Society
Description:Theory and Society is a forum for the international community of scholars that publishes theoretically-informed analyses of social processes. It opens its pages to authors working at the frontiers of social analysis, regardless of discipline. Its subject matter ranges from prehistory to contemporary affairs, from treatments of single individuals and national societies to world culture, from discussions of theory to methodological critique, from First World to Third World - but always in the effort to bring together theory, criticism and concrete observation.
Coverage: 1974-2014 (Vol. 1, No. 1 - Vol. 43, No. 6)
The "moving wall" represents the time period between the last issue available in JSTOR and the most recently published issue of a journal. Moving walls are generally represented in years. In rare instances, a publisher has elected to have a "zero" moving wall, so their current issues are available in JSTOR shortly after publication.
Note: In calculating the moving wall, the current year is not counted.
For example, if the current year is 2008 and a journal has a 5 year moving wall, articles from the year 2002 are available.
- Terms Related to the Moving Wall
- Fixed walls: Journals with no new volumes being added to the archive.
- Absorbed: Journals that are combined with another title.
- Complete: Journals that are no longer published or that have been combined with another title.
Subjects: Sociology, Social Sciences
Collections: Arts & Sciences II Collection, JSTOR Essential Collection
Baravise, Jon 1979: On branching quantifiers in English. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8, 47–80.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1977: Essays on Form and Interpretation. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
1980:Rules and Representations. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
1986:Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald 1984: Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Evans, G. 1977: Pronouns, quantifiers and relative clauses. Canadian Journal of Philosophy,7, 467–536.Google Scholar
Gödel, Kurt 1958: Über eine bisher noch nicht benützte Erweiterung des finiten Standpunktes. Dialectica, 12, 280–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haaparanta, Leila 1985: Frege ’s Doctrine of Being. (Acta Philosophica Fennica 39.) Helsinki: Societas Philosophica Fennica.Google Scholar
Heim, Irene R. 1982: The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Unpublished dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar
Henkin, Leon 1950: Completeness in the theory of types. journal of Symbolic Logic, 15, 81–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hintikka, Jaakko 1974: Quantifiers vs. quantification theory. Linguistic Inquiry, 5, 153–77. Repr. in Saarinen (ed.) 1979: Game-Theoretical Semantics.Google Scholar
1979: ‘Is’, semantical games, and semantical relativity. Journal ofPhilosophical Logic,8, 433–68. Repr. in Hintikka 1983: The Game of Language.Google Scholar
1982: Questions with outside quantifiers. In R. Schneider, K. Tuite, and R. Chametzky (eds), Papers from the Parasession on Nondeclaratives. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 83–92.Google Scholar
1983: The Game of Language. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
1986: On the semantics of ‘a certain’. Linguistic Inquiry, 17, 331–6.Google Scholar
1987a: Logic translation — an impossible dream? LMPS ’87: Abstracts, 5 (3),30–2.Google Scholar
1987b: Is scope a viable concept in semantics? In Fred Miller et al. (eds) ESCOL ’86. Ohio: Ohio State University at Columbus, Dept of Linguistics, 259–70.Google Scholar
1987c: Language understanding and strategic meaning. Synthese, 73, 497–529.Google Scholar
forthcoming(a): Is truth ineffable?Google Scholar
forthcoming(b): On the development of the model-theoretical tradition in logical theory. Synthese.Google Scholar
Hintikka, Jaakko and Saarinen, Esa 1975: Semantical games and the Bach—Peters paradox. Theoretical Linguistics, 2, 1–20. Repr. in Saarinen (ed.), 1979: Game-Theoretical Semantic.Google Scholar
Hintikka, Jaakko and Kulas, Jack 1985: Anaphora and Definite Descriptions: Two Applications of Game-Theoretical Semantics. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Hintikka, Jaakko and Sandu, Gabriel (forthcoming): Informational independence as a semantical phenomenon. Paper presented at the 1987 International Congress of Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science (Section on the Foundations of Linguistics). Proceedings of the Congress.Google Scholar
Hintikka, Jaakko and Knuuttila, Simo (eds) 1986: The Logic of Being: Historical Studies. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Hintikka, Merrill B. and Hintikka, Jaakko 1986: Investigating Wittgenstein. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert 1984: Logic as Grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kamp, Hans 1981: A theory of truth and semantic representation. In J. Groenendijk et al. (eds), Formal Methods in the Study of Language. Amsterdam: Mathematical Centre.Google Scholar
Karttunen, Lauri 1971: Definite descriptions with crossing coreference. Foundations of Language, 7, 157–82.Google Scholar
May, Robert 1985: Logical Form. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Montague, Richard, Kalish, D. and Mar, G. 1980: Logic: Techniques of Formal Reasoning, 2nd edn. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Otto, Herbert R. 1978: The Linguistic Basis of Logic Translation. Washington. D.C.: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Quine, W.V. 1960: Word and Object. Cambridge. Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand 1914: Our Knowledge of the External World. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Saarinen, Esa (ed.) 1979: Game-Theoretical Semantics. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Sells, Peter 1985: Lectures on Contemporary Syntactic Theories. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI.Google Scholar
Thomason, Richmond (ed.) 1986: Formal Philosophy: Selected Papen of Richard Montague. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig 1929: Some remarks on logical form. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 9, 162–71.Google Scholar
1974: Philosophical Grammar. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar